Sukumar
Sukumar v. Air Machine Com SRL
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 3/11/13 Sukumar v. Air Machine Com SRL
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PONANI N. SUKUMAR, et al., D060743
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2007-00052071-
CU-BC-NC)
AIR MACHINE COM SRL, et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Earl H. Maas,
III, Judge. Affirmed.
Ponani Sukumar and his physical rehabilitation clinic, Southern California Stroke
Rehabilitation Associates (together Sukumar), appeal orders dismissing Panatta Sport
SRL (Panatta) and Air Machine Com SRL (COM) from the action for lack of personal
jurisdiction. Sukumar contends the trial court erred when it granted the separate motions
to quash of Panatta…