P.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. He presented no argument for reversal, but asked this court to

review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436

(Wende). Under Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel

listed as a possible but not arguable issue, whether our reversal of count 8

precluded imposition of sentence on count 9. We granted Rosado permission to

file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. Our review of the record

pursuant to Wende, including the possible issue listed by counsel pursuant to

Anders, has disclosed no reasonably arguable issues on appeal. Competent

counsel has represented Rosado on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

MCINTYRE, J.

WE CONCUR:

MCCONNELL, P. J.

NARES, J.

3