P.

P. v. Uribe CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2013E053314California17,725 words

Opinion

Opinion

statement of facts. His statement is lengthy, but conveniently omits many of the facts supportive of the verdicts. Additionally, it is unhelpful to this court for appellate counsel for Lucero to cite one page of the record in a paragraph that contains a number of different statements of fact that are supported by numerous pages of the this very lengthy transcript. Because we must resolve factual conflicts in support of the verdicts and findings, we present a summary of the evidence that is consistent with this standard. (People v. Holt (1997) 15 Cal.4th 619, 667, 668.) Therefore, for the most part, we have omitted evidence that would impeach or contradict the evidence that supports the verdicts and findings.

3 also was charged with attempted murder, pled guilty and was sentenced to prison. At the

trial of the three gang members, in 2004, the victim testified against all three and they

were convicted. The victim’s mother and his sister testified at the instant trial that the

victim did this even though he was very scared. Jason was sentenced to prison for

years to life and the other two also received prison sentences. Jason’s gang moniker was

“Hubcaps” and he is the father…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.