P.

P. v. Taylor CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2013C070610California462 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/13/13 P. v. Taylor CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C070610

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11F7279)

v.

STEWART BRADLEY TAYLOR,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Stewart Bradley Taylor pleaded no contest to possession of methamphetamine and violating a domestic relations restraining order, and was sentenced to a prison term of two years eight months. The trial court awarded defendant 15 days of actual time credit, plus 6 days of conduct credit, for a total of 21 days of presentence custody credit. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that he should have received day-for-day credits. The People concede the error and we agree.

1 Effective October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.