P.

P. v. Flynn CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2013C069862California2,168 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/13/13 P. v. Flynn CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C069862

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 10F02146)

v.

JAMES FLYNN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant, who was like a grandfather to victim F., was found guilty of molesting him nine times over a three-year period. Defendant appeals from the resulting 24-year prison sentence, raising a number of evidentiary contentions. Finding the contentions forfeited or lack merit, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A The Prosecution F.’s mother began dating defendant’s stepson when F. was about six or seven years old. The stepson lived with defendant on a ranch in Galt, and F. spent a lot of time

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.