Glenn

Glenn v. Eull CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2013B239211California4,293 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/13/13 Glenn v. Eull CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

WILLIAM V. GLENN, JR., et al., B239211

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YC062020) v.

CLINTON B. EULL, III,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Stuart M. Rice, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Mark C. Fields, Mark C. Fields for Defendant and Appellant. Cohen & Lord, Bruce M. Cohen, Jonathan F. Golding, Rae Lamothe for Plaintiffs and Respondents. _______________ Defendant Clinton Eull appeals the judgment entered against him which found that he had wrongfully disparaged the title to the real property of plaintiffs William and Roxanne Glenn. Finding no error, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.