CA3

In re N v. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 2013C071788California3,326 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/14/13 In re N.V. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

In re N.V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES C071788

AGENCY,

(Super. Ct. No. J05419) Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

M.V.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Mario V., found to be the alleged father of minor Nadine V. (minor), appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating his parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code,1 § 366.26.) He first contends that the juvenile court violated his right to due process by failing to designate him a presumed father. He further contends that section 366.26, subdivision (c)(2)(A) precluded termination of his parental rights because “reasonable

Further undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.