O'Neal

O'Neal v. Nevius CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 2013B238640MCalifornia303 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/14/13 O’Neal v. Nevius CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

RYAN O’NEAL, B238640

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC113381) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

CRAIG NEVIUS, AND DENYING PETITION FOR

REHEARING

Defendant and Appellant. [No change in the judgment]

IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed in the above-captioned matter on February 14, 2013, be modified as follows: 1. On page 10, add a footnote at the end of the sentence commencing with “Accordingly, we find no error . . . .” The footnote should read: “In ruling on Nevius’s anti-SLAPP motion, the trial court recognized that O’Neal’s complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.