P.

P. v. Cantu CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2013C071224California771 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/18/13 P. v. Cantu CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C071224

v. (Super. Ct. No. CRF112243)

GREGORY CANTU,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Gregory Cantu asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) We will modify the judgment to reflect that defendant is awarded 48 days of presentence conduct credit pursuant to Penal Code section 2933.1,1 not section 4019. We will also direct the trial court to amend the abstract of judgment to

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 reflect the judgment as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.