McCray

McCray v. Metropolitan Transit System CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2013D060802California2,552 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/18/13 McCray v. Metropolitan Transit System CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

EMANUEL McCRAY, D060802

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00097606-

CU-PA-CTL)

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from judgments of the Superior Court of San Diego County, William R.

Nevitt, Jr., Judge. Affirmed.

Plaintiff, Emanuel McCray, appeals two judgments entered against him after the

trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrers of defendants, Metropolitan

Transit System (MTS) and USAA Casualty Insurance Company (USAA) and others.

The first amended complaint (FAC) named dozens of additional individual and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.