McCray
McCray v. Metropolitan Transit System CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 3/18/13 McCray v. Metropolitan Transit System CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EMANUEL McCRAY, D060802
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00097606-
CU-PA-CTL)
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from judgments of the Superior Court of San Diego County, William R.
Nevitt, Jr., Judge. Affirmed.
Plaintiff, Emanuel McCray, appeals two judgments entered against him after the
trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrers of defendants, Metropolitan
Transit System (MTS) and USAA Casualty Insurance Company (USAA) and others.
The first amended complaint (FAC) named dozens of additional individual and…