Lin

Lin v. City of Pleasanton CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2013A132046California4,001 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 3/18/13 Lin v. City of Pleasanton CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JENNIFER LIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

A132046

v. CITY OF PLEASANTON et al., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG10519153) Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiffs Jennifer and Frederic Lin (the Lins) appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint against defendants City of Pleasanton and the City Council of the City of Pleasanton after the trial court sustained a general demurrer without leave to amend. The Lins ask us to reinstate their lawsuit seeking enforcement of a development agreement. We affirm the judgment in favor of defendants.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1

A. Background The Lins own 562 acres of land in the City of Pleasanton.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.