Davidson

Davidson v. Tucker CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2013D057672California3,760 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/19/13 Davidson v. Tucker CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CURT DAVIDSON, D057672

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2007-00083689-

CU-BC-CTL)

KEVIN TUCKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Jay M.

Bloom, Judge. Affirmed.

In this dispute over a conditional settlement agreement between defendant and

appellant Kevin Tucker and plaintiff and respondent Curt Davidson, Tucker appeals a

superior court judgment that implements rulings vacating that agreement, as found in a

November 20, 2009 statement of decision issued by a mediator/arbitrator, who was acting

by stipulation of the parties in the capacity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.