P.

FACTS

On February 1, 2012, Scroggins entered a family residence with the intent to steal.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth evidence in the superior

court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks that this court review the

record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Counsel has not

referred us to any possible but not arguable issues. (See Anders v. California (1967) 386

U.S. 738. We granted Scroggins permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not

responded.

A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and

Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate

issue. Competent counsel has represented Scroggins on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

O'ROURKE, J.

AARON, J.

2