Bajan

Bajan v. Mikos CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2013D061380California1,339 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Filed 3/19/13 Bajan v. Mikos CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW BAJAN, JR., et al., D061380

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2008-00094754-

CU-FR-CTL)

JAN MIKOS et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard E.

L. Strauss, Judge. Reversed.

Matthew Bajan, Jr. (Matthew) and Boguslaw Bajan (Boguslaw) (collectively

Brothers) successfully moved for a judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section

664.6 (section 664.6) to enforce a written settlement agreement among multiple parties,

including Jan and Halina Mikos. The Mikoses appeal, contending the court erred in

entering judgment under section 664.6 because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.