Fhfa

County of Sonoma v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

Good Law
710 F.3d 987·2013 WL 1130925·43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20061·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5372
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 201312-16986California3,490 words

Opinion

Opinion

Murguia, J.

Defendant-Appellant Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) is the regulator and conservator of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (the “Enterprises”). The Enterprises are government-sponsored entities that purchase and securitize residential mortgages. FHFA issued a “directive” preventing the Enterprises from buying mortgages on properties encumbered by liens made under so-called property-assessed clean energy (“PACE”) programs, which finance environmental improvements on residential properties — and in return take an interest in those properties senior to any mortgagees’ interest. Plaintiffs-Appellees, including the State of California and several of its counties, are stakeholders in PACE programs. Plaintiffs-Appellees contend that FHFA acted as a regulator, and not a conservator, when it directed the Enterprises to cease purchasing mortgages on PACE-encumbered properties. And in acting as a regulator, Plaintiffs-Appellees argued in the district court, FHFA would require more than a fíat to order the Enterprises to stop buying mortgages on PACE-encumbered properties: as a regulator, Plaintiffs-Ap-pellees contended, FHFA must issue a regulation to effectuate its order.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.