Mulugeta Geberu v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
512 F. App'x 692
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 201309-73788California256 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Mulugeta G. Geberu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the Real ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010). We grant the petition for review and remand.

The agency’s findings that Geberu omitted from his asylum application and declaration that he suspected his brother was imprisoned or killed by the Ethiopian government and that his testimony was inconsistent with a letter he had in his possession from the leadership of his political party are not supported by substantial evidence. See Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1089 (9th Cir.2011) (analyzing claim under the Real ID Act’s standard, and concluding that substantial evidence did not support the adverse credibility determination). Accordingly, we grant Geberu’s petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.