Marriage of Shorr CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2013B232176California4,314 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/20/13 Marriage of Shorr CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

In re Marriage of RENEE and ALAN B232176

SHORR.

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BD458883)

RENEE M. BAZAR SHORR,

Appellant,

v.

ALAN SHORR,

Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark Juhas, Judge. Affirmed. Renee M. Bazar, in pro. per., for Appellant. Alan Shorr, in pro. per., for Respondent. _________________________ Renee M. Bazar (formerly Shorr) appeals from the judgment entered by the superior court following trial of the property issues remaining after the June 2008 status- only dissolution of her marriage to Alan Shorr. Renee1 contends the trial court erred as a matter of law in ordering her to reimburse Alan for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.