Sanai

Sanai v. Saltz CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2013B232770California9,783 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/20/13 Sanai v. Saltz CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

CYRUS M. SANAI, B232770

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC235671) v.

HARVEY A. SALTZ et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Kevin C. Brazile, Judge. Reversed with directions. Cyrus Sanai, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Jacobson Russell Saltz & Fingermann, Michael J. Saltz, Colby A. Petersen and Blair Schlecter, for Defendants and Respondents. 1 Cyrus M. Sanai originally sued The U.D. Registry, Inc. (UDR) and its owner, Harvey A. Saltz, in September 2000 for several torts and for violation of statutes regulating consumer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.