P.

P. v. Siler CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2013A132078California10,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 3/20/13 P. v. Siler CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A132078

v. MICHAEL ANTHONY SILER, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. C162290) Defendant and Appellant.

Michael Anthony Siler appeals from an order following a jury trial finding him to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the Sexually Violent Predators Act (Welfare & Institutions Code1 § 6600 et seq. (SVPA)) and committing him to the Department of Mental Health (DMH) for an indeterminate term. Defendant contends: (1) the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel by refusing to suspend SVP until it found he had been restored to competency; (2) the trial court erred by instructing the jury on his refusal to testify;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.