P.

P. v. Erwin CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2013A132396California952 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

Filed 3/20/13 P. v. Erwin CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A132396

v. JOEY RAY ERWIN, (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FC33794) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant was committed to an indeterminate term of confinement as a sexually violent predator (SVP). He raises several constitutional challenges to his confinement. We affirm the order of commitment on the basis of existing decisions of the Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal in which these challenges have been resolved against him as a matter of law. Discussion1 Following a jury trial in May 2011, defendant was found to be an SVP, and committed by the trial court to an indeterminate term. Defendant contends that his commitment for an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.