Jackson v. Robinson CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2013F064018California2,327 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/20/13 Jackson v. Robinson CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

FATEEN L. JACKSON,

F064018

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. S-1500-CV-268716) v.

M. ROBINSON et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. William D. Palmer, Judge. Fateen Jackson, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Jonathan L. Wolff, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas S. Patterson and Kenneth T. Roost, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo-

*Before Wiseman, Acting P.J., Levy, J., and Cornell, J. Plaintiff Fateen L. Jackson is serving a sentence in state prison. He sued a prison guard and several…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.