United States v. Valente Resio-Aragon

Good Law
512 F. App'x 728
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 201311-10675California379 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10675

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-01061-DGC

v.

MEMORANDUM *

VALENTE RESIO-ARAGON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Charles B. Kornmann, District Judge, Presiding **

Submitted March 12, 2013 ***

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Valente Resio-Aragon appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.