Quinoz

Quinoz v. Empire Today CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2013A134448California6,989 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/22/13 Quinoz v. Empire Today CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

GERMAN QUINONEZ,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A134448

v. (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. CIV493996)

EMPIRE TODAY, LLC,

Defendant and Appellant. ____________________________________/

German Quinonez filed a putative class action against Empire Today, LLC (Empire), a national flooring and window treatment business, alleging various Labor Code violations. Empire moved to dismiss for improper venue or, in the alternative, to compel arbitration pursuant to a form subcontractor agreement Quinonez signed. The trial court denied the motion. Among other things, the court concluded the arbitration provision in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.