United States v. Matthew Ploessel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 201312-50163California234 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50163

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00578-DSF

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MATTHEW PLOESSEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2013 **

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Matthew Ploessel appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking

probation and challenges the revocation of and nine-month sentence imposed upon

revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ploessel’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.