United States v. Matthew Ploessel
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 201312-50163California234 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 22 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50163
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00578-DSF
v.
MEMORANDUM *
MATTHEW PLOESSEL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 12, 2013 **
Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Matthew Ploessel appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking
probation and challenges the revocation of and nine-month sentence imposed upon
revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ploessel’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a
motion to withdraw as counsel of…