P.

P. v. Phillips CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2013A136896California1,706 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

Filed 3/22/13 P. v. Phillips CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A136896

v. KARL PHILLIPS, (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. 216220) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Karl Phillips appeals his conviction for second degree robbery, based upon a guilty plea entered after the trial court had denied his motion to suppress evidence. His appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 raising no issues. Defendant was informed of his right to file a supplemental brief, which he has not done. Upon independent review of the record, we conclude no arguable issues are presented for review and affirm the judgment. Factual and Procedural History…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.