Marriage of Castaneda CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2013C067676California3,830 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/22/13 Marriage of Castaneda CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

In re the Marriage of MANUEL and REBECCA

CASTANEDA.

C067676

MANUEL CASTANEDA,

(Super. Ct. No. 06FL07064) Appellant,

v.

REBECCA HANDAL,

Respondent.

Manuel Castaneda (husband) appeals from a postjudgment order directing him to produce documents responsive to a notice to produce documents at trial and to pay $3,155 in monetary sanctions in the form of attorney fees and costs to Rebecca Handal (wife) under Family Code section 271.1 Husband contends the trial court abused its discretion and violated his federal and state constitutional right to due process of law by basing the sanctions award on his and

Further unspecified section references are to the Family Code.

1 his counsel‟s conduct at husband‟s deposition, a ground not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.