Glenn Tibble v. Edison International

Good Law
711 F.3d 1061·2013 WL 1174167
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 201310-56406, 10-56415California11,509 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

Current and former beneficiaries sued their employer’s benefit plan administrator under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act charging that their pension plan had been managed imprudently and in a self-interested fashion. We must decide, among other issues, whether the Act’s limitations period or its safe harbor provision are obstacles to their suit.

I

A

Edison International is a holding company for various electric utilities and other energy interests including Southern California Edison Company and the Edison Mission Group (collectively “Edison”), which itself consists of the Chicago-based Midwest Generation. Like most employer-organizations offering pensions today, Edison sponsors a 401(k) retirement plan for its workforce. During litigation, the total valuation of the “Edison 401(k) Savings Plan” was $3.8 billion, and it served approximately 20,000 employee-beneficiaries across the entire Edison International workforce. Unlike the guaranteed benefit pension plans of yesteryear, this kind of defined-contribution plan entitles retirees only to the value of their own individual investment accounts. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (34). That value is a function of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.