United States v. Paul Castro-Lopez

Good Law
514 F. App'x 641
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 201311-10679California290 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Paul Antonio Castro-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 (a) and 960(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(ii); and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(ii)(II). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Castro-Lopez contends that the district court erred in denying his request for a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). Castro-Lopez argues that he was entitled to the adjustment because he was merely a courier who believed he was carrying marijuana and not cocaine. The court did not clearly err in denying the adjustment. See United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1193 (9th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1061 , 181 L.Ed.2d 778 (2012). Because the record reflects that 62 kilograms of cocaine were concealed in the roof of the car driven and registered to Castro-Lopez, he failed to establish that he was substan tially less culpable than the average participant. See id. (“The court was justifiably skeptical that this amount of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.