United States v. Ezri Namvar
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 201311-50447California379 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 26 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50447
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01055-PA-1 Central District of California, v. Los Angeles
EZRI NAMVAR, AKA Ezri Namvar Moghadam, ORDER
Defendant - Appellant.
Before: BRIGHT,1* GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed in this case on November 20, 2012 is
amended by deleting the following text immediately after the word “fraud,” on
page 3, line 14 of the text of the memorandum:
“because so long as “‘a scheme is devised with the intent to defraud,’” it is
immaterial that “there is no misrepresentation of a single existing fact.” United
States v. Woods, 335 F.3d 993, 998 (9th Cir. 2003) (emphasis omitted) (quoting
Lustiger v. United States, 386 F.2d 132, 138 (9th Cir. 1967)).”
* The Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. Additionally, the following text,…