P.

P. v. Clark CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2013C071649California1,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/27/13 P. v. Clark CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

THE PEOPLE, C071649

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 09F06018)

v.

LOUREECE CLARK,

Defendant and Appellant.

This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we affirm the judgment. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.) On August 8, 2009, Jordan Latour and Marcus Zapata committed an armed robbery of a Wells Fargo Bank in Rocklin. The robbers wore ski masks, pointed their guns at bank employees, and directed everyone to lie on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.