P.

P. v. Wilson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2013D061767California1,913 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Filed 3/28/13 P. v. Wilson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D061767

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD234221)

MARKEVIN WILSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard S.

Whitney, Judge. Affirmed.

In this appeal, Markevin Wilson challenges the amount of victim restitution he

was ordered to pay as a condition of probation. We reject his claim of error and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Markevin Wilson and two codefendants, Roy Winters and Jessica Wise, were

prosecuted for a number of theft-related crimes, including conspiracy to commit grand

theft. The crimes arose from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.