P.

P. v. Moore CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2013A134245California4,805 words

Opinion

Opinion

Simons, J.

Filed 3/28/13 P. v. Moore CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A134245 v. WILLIAM ANDREW MOORE, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. H50854) Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant William Andrew Moore challenges his conviction for second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) following a jury trial.1 He argues the trial court erred in failing to exclude evidence he had purchased a BB gun the day before the robbery. He also contends trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to evidence the victim identified him in a single-person “showup,” to hearsay testimony regarding the amount of money stolen, and to prosecutorial misconduct during closing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.