P.

P. v. Reed CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2013A133225California6,785 words

Opinion

Opinion

Simons, J.

Filed 3/28/13 P. v. Reed CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A133225 v. TYRONE LAMONT REED, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. C156325) Defendant and Appellant.

A jury convicted appellant Tyrone Lamont Reed of multiple sex offenses against his minor daughter Dianne.1 In a prior appeal, this court reversed the judgment of conviction and remanded the case, concluding the trial court erred by failing to inquire into Reed’s reasons for “a motion for incompetence of counsel” he sought to make at his sentencing hearing. (People v. Reed (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1137, 1141, 1143-1149 (Reed I).) On remand, the trial court reinstated the judgment, and Reed appeals,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.