P.

P. v. Zeisler CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2013A136991California779 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bruiniers, J.

I. BACKGROUND

In case No. SC073016, Zeisler was convicted on March 21, 2011, on a no contest plea to one felony count of possession of a controlled substance, and placed on Proposition 36 probation. On February 22, 2012, Zeisler entered a plea of guilty to one felony count of possession of a controlled substance in case No. SC075017. He admitted violating his probation in case No. SC073016 as a result of that new offense. He was granted probation on the new case and reinstated to probation on the earlier matter. A condition of probation in both matters was that Zeisler report to his probation officer. On April 25, 2012, affidavits were filed in each matter, alleging a violation of probation based on Zeisler’s failure to report to the probation department. On July 30, 2012, he admitted the violations and probation in each case was revoked and reinstated on the original terms. Zeisler was specifically directed to contact probation officer Lesley Roehr. On September 13, 2012, new affidavits were filed in each case, alleging Zeisler had violated probation by commission of new offenses (petty theft, false identification to a peace officer and possession of paraphernalia) and by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.