P.

P. v. White CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2013C069249California3,873 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/29/13 P. v. White CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C069249

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 09F01087)

v.

MIGUEL WHITE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Miguel White and an accomplice robbed three pizza delivery men at gunpoint. During the third robbery, defendant shot the delivery man in the leg. Following a jury trial, he was convicted of three counts of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211)1 and one count of attempted carjacking (§§ 664/215, subd. (a)). Additionally, the jury found true three enhancements for personal use of a firearm

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 (§ 12022.53, subd. (b)) and an enhancement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.