Heritage Pacific Financial v. Monroy CA1/2

Good Law
156 Cal. Rptr. 3d 26·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 323·215 Cal. App. 4th 972·2013 WL 1779278
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2013A135274, A136043California14,442 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lambden, J.

Maribel Monroy executed two promissory notes with WMC Mortgage Corp. (WMC) when purchasing a home in Richmond, California, in 2006 (the Richmond property). After a foreclosure on the senior deed of trust, Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC (Heritage), acquired Monroy’s second promissory note from WMC. Heritage sent Monroy a letter attached to a complaint and summons advising her that Heritage had filed a lawsuit against her alleging various fraud claims. The letter admonished that any misinformation provided by Monroy on her original loan application with WMC could result in civil liability and that Heritage would proceed with a lawsuit if it were unable to resolve the matter with Monroy. Monroy filed a cross-complaint against Heritage, alleging violations of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act; Civ. Code, § 1788 et seq.) and the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA or the Act; 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.).

After permitting Heritage to amend its complaint three times, the trial court sustained Monroy’s demurrer against Heritage’s pleading on the grounds that Heritage had failed to provide or allege an assignment agreement with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.