In re Trevon H. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 2013D062924California292 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

BACKGROUND

In February 2012, Trevon burglarized Mr. A.'s home (count 3). In May, Trevon

burglarized Ms. K.'s home (count 1).

Mr. A. requested restitution of $7,549 for property taken and damaged during the

burglary. Trevon's counsel did not contest the amount of the claim, and the court ordered

Trevon to pay restitution in that amount.

Ms. K. initially requested restitution of $2,180 for property taken and damaged

during the burglary. At the restitution hearing, she increased her request to $3,044.80.

Trevon's counsel argued that the appropriate amount of restitution was $2,750.27. In

rebuttal, the prosecutor argued that the restitution order should be $15.13 more than that

amount, and Trevon's counsel conceded the point. The court ordered Trevon to pay Ms.

K. $2,765.40.

The court also ordered Trevon to pay $897.06 in restitution to the victim in

another residential burglary count that was dismissed with a Harvey waiver (People v.

Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754), and $126 to Vintage Realty for a window broken during

one of the burglaries.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.