United States v. Jesus Andrade

Good Law
514 F. App'x 688
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 201312-35113California715 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Defendant-Appellant Jorge Bravo-Bravo (a/k/a Jesus Andradé-Perez) appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of audita querela, or in the alternative, a writ of coram nobis. Appellant seeks to vacate his 1998 conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, for which he has already-completed the sentence. He contends that he is entitled to relief because his sentencing guidelines for the 1998 conviction were based, in part, on a 1995 state court conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine for sale. In 2010, a California court vacated the 1995 conviction and, in its place, entered a conviction for the lesser charge of mere possession of a controlled substance.

We review de novo a district court’s denial of a petition for a writ of audita querela or coram nobis. See United States v. Hovsepian, 359 F.3d 1144 , 1153 (9th Cir.2004) (en banc); Matus-Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758, 760 (9th Cir. 2002). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

1. A party seeking a writ of audita querela must demonstrate “a legal defect in the conviction, or in the sentence which taints the conviction.” Doe v. INS, 120 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.