P.

P. v. Fekadu CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 5, 2013D062855California2,039 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/5/13 P. v. Fekadu CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D062855

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD109580)

BERIHU HADARA FEKADU,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Laura H.

Parsky, Judge. Affirmed.

Berihu Hadara Fekadu appeals from a decision granting a petition to extend his

commitment as a person found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI) for an additional

two-year period (Pen. Code,1 § 1026.5). He contends there is not sufficient evidence to

prove that because of his mental illness he remains a danger to others. We will find the

evidence sufficient to support the trial court's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.