Trabert

Trabert v. Consumer Portfolio Services CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 8, 2013D060491California8,228 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/8/13 Trabert v. Consumer Portfolio Services CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SHAUN TRABERT, D060491

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00096763-

CU-BT-CTL)

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES,

INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, John S.

Meyer, Judge. Reversed with directions.

Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. (Portfolio) appeals an order denying its petition

to compel arbitration of its lawsuit with Shaun Trabert. Portfolio contends the court erred by determining the arbitration clause in an automobile purchase contract was

unconscionable and therefore unenforceable. We reverse with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.