Khodayari

Khodayari v. Ardalan CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 10, 2013B239102California8,029 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/10/13 Khodayari v. Ardalan CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

BAHMAN KHODAYARI, B239102

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC090227) v.

PEZHMAN CHRISTOPHER ARDALAN

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, James Kaddo, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part. Bahman Khodayari, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Office of Brett W. Wolff and Brett W. Wolff for Defendants and Respondents. This appeal arises from an action by Bahman Khodayari against Pezhman Christopher Ardalan individually and Ardalan & Associates (collectively defendants) for failing to represent him through trial in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.