In re Ruby G. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 11, 2013D062856California2,614 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/11/13 In re Ruby G. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re RUBY G., et al., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

D062856

SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,

(Super. Ct. No. NJ014260 A-E) Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CYNTHIA G.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Michael J.

Imhoff, Commissioner. Affirmed.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the juvenile court abused its discretion at

the disposition hearing by not placing the children with the maternal grandparents and

instead placing them with other relatives. We find no abuse of discretion and thus affirm

the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

First Dependency Case

In late 2009, when Cynthia G.'s five children were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.