Glaser

Glaser v. Meserve CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 11, 2013B240385California4,988 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/11/13 Glaser v. Meserve CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

PAUL MICHAEL GLASER, B240385

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SS021888) v.

PAMELA MESERVE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lisa Hart Cole, Judge. Affirmed.

Winston & Strawn, Marcus T. Hall, Craig C. Crockett; Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg and Marcus T. Hall for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

****** Plaintiff and respondent Paul Michael Glaser (Glaser) sought and obtained a six- month civil harassment restraining order pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.61 against defendant and appellant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.