Clay

Clay v. AT&T West, Inc. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 11, 2013C069489California2,338 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Soon after filing his original complaint, Clay filed an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order to prevent AT&T West from transferring Clay from his employment in Stockton to another job location, apparently in Fresno. He claimed that a transfer would inhibit his ability to retain custody of his daughter and result in not being able to make mortgage payments on his house in Stockton. AT&T West, represented by attorney Glen Turner, opposed the application, and the trial court denied it. AT&T West failed to file a timely answer to the complaint, so Clay requested entry of default, which the court clerk entered. The court held a hearing on the default judgment but denied the request for default judgment because the statement of damages had not been served on AT&T West. AT&T West filed an ex parte application for relief from default. In support of the application, attorney Turner filed a declaration stating that he was retained to represent AT&T West. When the trial court denied the application for a temporary restraining order, Clay said to attorney Turner, “I just got the decision. Looks like I‟m done here.” Based on that statement and his belief that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.