Jesse Busk v. Integrity Staffing Solutions

Bad Law
713 F.3d 525·2013 WL 1490577·20 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 937·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7397
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 201311-16892California3,857 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas, J.

In this appeal, we consider whether the district court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs’ state law claims for unpaid wages because those claims would be certified using different class certification procedures than their federal wage and hour claims. We also consider whether the plaintiffs have alleged plausible claims for unpaid wages under federal and Nevada law for undergoing a security screening meant to prevent employee theft and for unpaid lunch periods shortened by five-minute walks to the cafeteria. We affirm the district court in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I

Plaintiffs Jesse Busk and Laurie Castro are former employees of Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc., which provides warehouse space and staffing to clients such as Amazon.com. Busk and Castro worked as hourly employees at warehouses in Las Vegas and Fernley, Nevada, respectively, filling orders placed by Amazon.com customers. In 2010, Busk and Castro sued Integrity on behalf of a putative class of workers in both warehouses, claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Nevada labor laws.

Busk and Castro alleged Integrity violated federal and state labor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.