Marriage of Maynard CA6
Opinion
Opinion
Manoukian, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellant Mark T. Maynard and respondent Julia S. Maynard were married for over 20 years and had two children.1 In 2008, the parties separated and Julia filed a petition for dissolution of marriage. At issue in the present appeal is the trial court‟s May 28, 2010 “Order After Trial On Real Estate Issues,” which divided five pieces of real property acquired by the parties during their marriage, ruled on the valuation of the properties and the parties‟ reimbursement claims, and ordered Mark to pay Julia “a net
1 Adopting the practice in the proceedings below, we will hereafter refer to the parties by their first names for purposes of clarity and meaning no disrespect. (In re Marriage of West (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 240, 242, fn. 1.) equalizing payment of $127,126.00, payable upon completion of the division of the parties‟ remaining property.” We understand Mark to contend that the May 28, 2010 order should be reversed because the trial court erred in its rulings on property valuation and the reimbursement claims. We also understand Mark to seek review of two additional trial court rulings: the May 15, 2009 denial of his request for accommodation under the Americans…