In re J.C. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Mother appeals from an order terminating parental rights to her two sons, G.C.
(born in 2006) and J.C. (born in 2008). Mother contends the juvenile court erred in
rejecting the beneficial parent relationship exception to adoption under Welfare and
Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i).1 Mother also asserts that the
juvenile court violated her substantive due process rights and right to equal protection by
refusing to allow her sons to visit her while locally incarcerated. Mother further contends
she was deprived of competent representation because her trial attorney did not request
in-custody visitation or object to the custody orders.2 Without filing a separate appellate
brief, father joins in and adopts mother‟s contentions on appeal to the extent mother‟s
arguments benefit his interests. We reject mother‟s contentions and father‟s joinder, and
affirm the judgment.
II
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 13, 2009, San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS)
Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.