P.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Carol Anna Corral appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of four counts of second degree commercial burglary, four counts of passing bad checks, and one count of forging an official seal. Corral argues that at the sentencing hearing, the trial court erred by ordering her to pay the costs of the mandatory supervision portion of her sentence under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (h), without complying with the requirements of Penal Code section 1203.1b. (All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.) She also argues the abstract of judgment inaccurately states that three of her convictions for second degree commercial burglary constitute violent felonies. We affirm the judgment of conviction. We remand the matter to the trial court to clarify that the procedures mandated by section 1203.1b shall be followed before Corral is ordered to pay all or any portion of the costs incurred during the mandatory supervision term of her sentence. Because the abstract of judgment erroneously states three of Corral’s second degree commercial burglary offenses constituted violent offenses within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision…