Hoofman
Hoofman v. Pacific Crest Community Assn. CA2/1
Opinion
Opinion
Johnson, J.
Filed 4/16/13 Hoofman v. Pacific Crest Community Assn. CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
GLENN HOOFMAN et al., B230036
Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC364488) v.
PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Carolyn B. Kuhl, Judge. Affirmed. Schimmel & Parks, Alan I. Schimmel and Michael W. Parks for Plaintiffs and Appellants. The Manship Law Firm and Penny J. Manship for Defendant and Respondent. —————————— Sarah and Glenn Hoofman appeal summary judgment in favor of respondent and cross-appellant Pacific Crest Community Association (PCCA). The Hoofmans commenced a…