Hoofman

Hoofman v. Pacific Crest Community Assn. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 2013B230036California10,452 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 4/16/13 Hoofman v. Pacific Crest Community Assn. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

GLENN HOOFMAN et al., B230036

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC364488) v.

PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITY

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Carolyn B. Kuhl, Judge. Affirmed. Schimmel & Parks, Alan I. Schimmel and Michael W. Parks for Plaintiffs and Appellants. The Manship Law Firm and Penny J. Manship for Defendant and Respondent. —————————— Sarah and Glenn Hoofman appeal summary judgment in favor of respondent and cross-appellant Pacific Crest Community Association (PCCA). The Hoofmans commenced a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.