Eric Petzschke v. Century Aluminum Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 201311-15599California3,352 words

Opinion

Opinion

Watford, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN RE: CENTURY ALUMINUM No. 11-15599

COMPANY SECURITIES

LITIGATION , D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01001-SI ERIC PETZSCHKE , individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; STUART ORDER AND WEXLER, lead plaintiff for the AMENDED OPINION Securities Act claims; CORY

MCCLELLAN ; PETER ABRAMS;

CHRIS MCNULTY ,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY ;

LOGAN W. KRUGER; MICHAEL A.

BLESS; STEVE SCHNEIDER; JOHN

C. FONTAINE ; JACK E.

THOMPSON ; PETER C. JONE; JOHN

P. O’BRIEN ; WILLY R.

STROTHOTTE; JARL BERNTZEN ;

CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA)

LLC; MORGAN STANLEY & CO .,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding IN RE: CENTURY ALUMINUM CO .

Argued and Submitted August 8, 2012—San Francisco, California

Filed January 2, 2013 Amended April 17, 2013

Before: Consuelo M. Callahan and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges, and James K. Singleton, Senior District Judge.*

Opinion by Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.